The Changing Faces of These People
My husband, Dave, sent me this. It's a beautifully done video illustrating women in art, but he thought, and I agree, that it aptly illustrates how these folks morph and change, changing fake identities endlessly. If you successfully report one, they just create a new one. They twist not only their own identities, but even what they read, so that if I type "I don't care about GRACE," that becomes "I don't care." And "I don't care" becomes an indictment that I am heartless and cold. If I had typed "I don't care for shrimp," they would do the same thing.
Thank you, David Davis. It's a beautiful video.
Links to Related Material
In reading about all this, I keep finding articles and web sites that are interesting and at least to some extent related to all this. This will be an ongoing effort to collect them. I won't apologize for including the occasional link to my own blog.
I am politically very liberal, and tend to rarely agree with stuff coming from Reason, which is voice of Libertarian politics. However, occasionally, I find myself in that position, and this is one of those times. In an article entitled "Guilty Until Proven Innocent," Cathy Young addresses the problem of alleged sexual assault on college campuses.
Much of this reaction was well-intentioned. Yet in the end rape-culture feminism promotes not only a toxic view of relationships but a skewed and dangerous view of justice. Its key tenets: 1) Women almost never lie when they report a sex crime, and to doubt them is to perpetuate rape culture; 2) rape is any sexual act in which the woman feels violated-unless she suffers from false consciousness and needs to be educated about her violation; 3) rape includes situations in which the woman agrees to sex because of persistent advances, "emotional coercion," or intoxication-or because she doesn't have the nerve to say no; 4) no matter how willing the woman appears to be, it is the man's responsibility to ensure explicit consent-or he may be guilty of rape.
Written before I ever saw the article from Reason, here are my own thoughts on the subject from my blog.
A pretty sorry side effect of all this is that I know citing Dwayne Walker's blog will result in accusations of conspiracy. So be it. Think whatever you like.
A few might be critical of this new path saying I should concentrate on the first abusers. However, as I see more and more 'advocates' utilizing the same techniques as those who cover up the deeds of the first abusers, it's only a matter of time before a major scandal hits and reveals that so-called survivors are just as guilty of covering up the dirt as those fundamentalists they have accused.
This schmucky feeling is a byproduct of the internet. Our natural bullshit detectors are muted online; we can't rely on facial expressions and other physical cues for sensing lies, and studies suggest that without those cues, we're prone to generously fill in the blanks.
Cienna Madrid, from The Lying Disease
Are there kingdoms of emotion where logic is taboo, dare not show its face, zones where reason is too intimidated to speak?
It is utterly deplorable that there are people, including in our atheist community, who suffer rape threats because of things they have said. And it is also deplorable that there are many people in the same atheist community who are literally afraid to think and speak freely, afraid to raise even hypothetical questions such as those I have mentioned in this article. They are afraid – and I promise you I am not exaggerating – of witch-hunts: hunts for latter day blasphemers by latter day Inquisitions and latter day incarnations of Orwell's Thought Police.
Our focus on getting justice for women who are sexually assaulted is necessary and right. We are still far from the day when every woman who makes a rape accusation gets a proper police investigation and a fair hearing. But seeking justice for female victims should make us more sensitive, not less, to justice for unfairly accused men.
An excellent overview of the foibles of memory, and how inaccurate it can be.
R. T. was far from alone in her misplaced confidence. When the psychologists rated the accuracy of the students’ recollections for things like where they were and what they were doing, the average student scored less than three on a scale of seven. A quarter scored zero. But when the students were asked about their confidence levels, with five being the highest, they averaged 4.17. Their memories were vivid, clear—and wrong. There was no relationship at all between confidence and accuracy.
Mimicry is a form of flattery. I'm sort of delighted that they noticed. However, they get a few things really wrong. First, there is nobody here that could be called "The Prophet." I am the sole owner of this web site. Second, these monikers are tongue-in-cheek. I actually am an atheist. It's not a secret. And third, my Facebook and this Contact page are readily available to anyone. Nobody has tried asking questions of me except by hiding behind fake identities and posting questions I cannot see because I'm blocked.
You want to ask a question? That's great. I absolutely promise that you will get a reply, even if you're really mad at me.
However, this web site actually is about telling the truth. Therefore, here is the link to the actual blog, as it is right this minute, not a bogus link to WayBack like they provide.
They really, really want to redirect folks to their little Facebook page. Happy to oblige.
Update: The bogus blog remains up. The links are all broken because the Facebook page they are linking to has been removed.
Update March 6, 2015: And they appear to have removed it altogether.